The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0
WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria
The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines Success Criteria relevant to forms are:
SC | Description |
---|---|
1.1.1 | Non-text Content: All non-text content that is presented to the user has a text alternative that serves the equivalent purpose, except for the situations listed below. (Level A)
|
1.3.1 | Info and Relationships: Information, structure, and relationships conveyed through presentation can be programmatically determined or are available in text. (Level A) |
1.3.2 | Meaningful Sequence: When the sequence in which content is presented affects its meaning, a correct reading sequence can be programmatically determined. (Level A) |
1.3.3 | Sensory Characteristics: Instructions provided for understanding and operating content do not rely solely on sensory characteristics of components such as shape, size, visual location, orientation, or sound. (Level A) |
2.1.1 | Keyboard: All functionality of the content is operable through a keyboard interface without requiring specific timings for individual keystrokes, except where the underlying function requires input that depends on the path of the user’s movement and not just the endpoints. (Level A) |
2.1.2 | No Keyboard Trap: If keyboard focus can be moved to a component of the page using a keyboard interface, then focus can be moved away from that component using only a keyboard interface, and, if it requires more than unmodified arrow or tab keys or other standard exit methods, the user is advised of the method for moving focus away. (Level A) |
2.4.3 | Focus Order: If a Web page can be navigated sequentially and the navigation sequences affect meaning or operation, focusable components receive focus in an order that preserves meaning and operability. (Level A) |
2.4.5 | Multiple Ways: More than one way is available to locate a Web page within a set of Web pages except where the Web Page is the result of, or a step in, a process. (Level AA) |
2.4.7 | Focus Visible: Any keyboard operable user interface has a mode of operation where the keyboard focus indicator is visible. (Level AA) |
3.2.1 | On Focus: When any component receives focus, it does not initiate a change of context. (Level A) |
3.2.2 | On Input: Changing the setting of any user interface component does not automatically cause a change of context unless the user has been advised of the behavior before using the component. (Level A) |
3.2.4 | Consistent Identification: Components that have the same functionality within a set of Web pages are identified consistently. (Level AA) |
3.3.1 | Error Identification: If an input error is automatically detected, the item that is in error is identified and the error is described to the user in text. (Level A) |
3.3.2 | Labels or Instructions: Labels or instructions are provided when content requires user input. (Level A) |
3.3.3 | Error Suggestion: If an input error is automatically detected and suggestions for correction are known, then the suggestions are provided to the user, unless it would jeopardize the security or purpose of the content. (Level AA) |
3.3.4 | Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data): For Web pages that cause legal commitments or financial transactions for the user to occur, that modify or delete user-controllable data in data storage systems, or that submit user test responses, at least one of the following is true: (Level AA)
|
Copyright © W3C 11 December 2008 World Wide Web Consortium [Status: Recommendation]
The relevant guidelines are detailed in the website manager factsheet.
WCAG 2.0 Sufficient Techniques
For each of the guidelines and success criteria in WCAG 2.0 there are a wide variety of techniques. The techniques fall into two categories: Sufficient techniques – techniques or a combination of techniques that are sufficient for meeting the success criteria. Advisory techniques – techniques that should be considered (where relevant) to make content more accessible. The advisory techniques go beyond what is required by the individual success criteria and are not covered by these factsheets.
Copyright © W3C 11 December 2008 World Wide Web Consortium [Status: Recommendation]
WCAG 2.0 Common Failures
SC 1.1.1 Non-text Content
The following are common mistakes that are considered failures of Success Criterion 1.1.1 by the WCAG Working Group.
Failure | Description |
---|---|
F65 | Failure of Success Criterion 1.1.1 due to omitting the alt attribute on img elements, area elements, and input elements of type “image” |
Copyright © W3C 11 December 2008 World Wide Web Consortium [Status: Recommendation]
SC 1.3.1 Info and Relationships
The following are common mistakes that are considered failures of Success Criterion 1.3.1 by the WCAG Working Group.
Failure | Description |
---|---|
F2 | Failure of Success Criterion 1.3.1 due to using changes in text presentation to convey information without using the appropriate markup or text |
F17 | Failure of Success Criterion 1.3.1 and 4.1.1 due to insufficient information in DOM to determine one-to-one relationships (e.g., between labels with same id) in HTML |
F42 | Failure of Success Criterion 1.3.1 and 2.1.1 due to using scripting events to emulate links in a way that is not programmatically determinable |
Copyright © W3C 11 December 2008 World Wide Web Consortium [Status: Recommendation]
SC 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence
The following are common mistakes that are considered failures of Success Criterion 1.3.2 by the WCAG Working Group.
Failure | Description |
---|---|
F1 | Failure of Success Criterion 1.3.2 due to changing the meaning of content by positioning information with CSS |
Copyright © W3C 11 December 2008 World Wide Web Consortium [Status: Recommendation]
SC 1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics
The following are common mistakes that are considered failures of Success Criterion 1.3.3 by the WCAG Working Group.
Failure | Description |
---|---|
F14 | Failure of Success Criterion 1.3.3 due to identifying content only by its shape or location |
Copyright © W3C 11 December 2008 World Wide Web Consortium [Status: Recommendation]
SC 2.1.1 Keyboard
The following are common mistakes that are considered failures of Success Criterion 2.1.1 by the WCAG Working Group.
Failure | Description |
---|---|
F54 | Failure of Success Criterion 2.1.1 due to using only pointing-device-specific event handlers (including gesture) for a function |
F55 | Failure of Success Criteria 2.1.1, 2.4.7, and 3.2.1 due to using script to remove focus when focus is received |
Copyright © W3C 11 December 2008 World Wide Web Consortium [Status: Recommendation]
SC 2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap
The following are common mistakes that are considered failures of Success Criterion 2.1.2 by the WCAG Working Group.
Failure | Description |
---|---|
F10 | Failure of Success Criterion 2.1.2 and Conformance Requirement 5 due to combining multiple content formats in a way that traps users inside one format type |
Copyright © W3C 11 December 2008 World Wide Web Consortium [Status: Recommendation]
SC 2.4.3 Focus Order
The following are common mistakes that are considered failures of Success Criterion 2.4.3 by the WCAG Working Group.
Failure | Description |
---|---|
F44 | Failure of Success Criterion 2.4.3 due to using tabindex to create a tab order that does not preserve meaning and operability |
F85 | Failure of Success Criterion 2.4.3 due to using dialogs or menus that are not adjacent to their trigger control in the sequential navigation order |
SC 2.4.5 Multiple ways
There are no common failures currently documented for the Success Criterion 2.4.5 in WCAG2.0. Copyright © W3C 11 December 2008 World Wide Web Consortium [Status: Recommendation]SC 2.4.7 Focus visible
The following are common mistakes that are considered failures of Success Criterion 2.4.7 by the WCAG Working Group.
Failure | Description |
---|---|
F55 | Failure of Success Criteria 2.1.1, 2.4.7, and 3.2.1 due to using script to remove focus when focus is received |
F78 | Failure of Success Criterion 2.4.7 due to styling element outlines and borders in a way that removes or renders non-visible the visual focus indicator |
Copyright © W3C 11 December 2008 World Wide Web Consortium [Status: Recommendation]
SC 3.2.1 On Focus
The following are common mistakes that are considered failures of Success Criterion 3.2.1 by the WCAG Working Group.
Failure | Description |
---|---|
F55 | Failure of Success Criteria 2.1.1, 2.4.7, and 3.2.1 due to using script to remove focus when focus is received |
Copyright © W3C 11 December 2008 World Wide Web Consortium [Status: Recommendation]
SC 3.2.2 On Input
The following are common mistakes that are considered failures of Success Criterion 3.2.2 by the WCAG Working Group.
Failure | Description |
---|---|
F36 | Failure of Success Criterion 3.2.2 due to automatically submitting a form and presenting new content without prior warning when the last field in the form is given a value |
F37 | Failure of Success Criterion 3.2.2 due to launching a new window without prior warning when the status of a radio button, check box or select list is changed |
F76 | Failure of Success Criterion 3.2.2 due to providing instruction material about the change of context by change of setting in a user interface element at a location that users may bypass |
SC 3.2.4 Consistent Identification
The following are common mistakes that are considered failures of Success Criterion 3.2.4 by the WCAG Working Group.
Failure | Description |
---|---|
F31 | Failure of Success Criterion 3.2.4 due to using two different labels for the same function on different Web pages within a set of Web pages |
Copyright © W3C 11 December 2008 World Wide Web Consortium [Status: Recommendation]
SC 3.3.1 Error Identification
There are no common failures currently documented for the Success Criterion 3.3.1 in WCAG2.0.
Copyright © W3C 11 December 2008 World Wide Web Consortium [Status: Recommendation]
SC 3.3.2 Labels and Instructions
The following are common mistakes that are considered failures of Success Criterion 3.3.2 by the WCAG Working Group.
Failure | Description |
---|---|
F82 | Failure of Success Criterion 3.3.2 by visually formatting a set of phone number fields but not including a text label |
Copyright © W3C 11 December 2008 World Wide Web Consortium [Status: Recommendation]
SC 3.3.3 Error suggestions
There are no common failures currently documented for the Success Criterion 3.3.3 in WCAG2.0.
Copyright © W3C 11 December 2008 World Wide Web Consortium [Status: Recommendation]
SC 3.3.4 Error Prevention
There are no common failures currently documented for the Success Criterion 3.3.4 in WCAG2.0.
Copyright © W3C 11 December 2008 World Wide Web Consortium [Status: Recommendation]